aislop.day
SATURDAY, 29 JANUARY 2022

Annual Review of Weekend Reply Disclaimer

The message was sent Saturday at 11 a.m. with a note that no response was expected until Monday.

3 MIN READboundary performance

Correspondence on File: Weekend Reply Disclaimer Submitted to the Annual Review of Workplace Communication Norms, January 2022


To the Review Panel:

I am writing to document a practice that has become standard in my professional communications and that I believe merits formal examination.

When I send a work message on a weekend, I append a disclaimer. The disclaimer states that no response is expected until Monday.

The disclaimer is sincere. I do not expect a response until Monday.

I am writing to note that the act of sending the message, and then appending a disclaimer to the message, produces a structural peculiarity that I have not yet fully resolved.

The message communicates a need or a question. The disclaimer communicates that the need or question does not require the recipient's attention until a specified future date. The message and the disclaimer are therefore in mild tension, inasmuch as a need that does not require attention until Monday could theoretically have been sent on Monday.

I am not sending it on Monday. I am sending it now.

The reasons for sending it now are as follows: I am thinking about it now. Sending it now removes it from my active consideration. Retaining it until Monday would require me to remember it. The disclaimer resolves the ethical dimension of this timing decision by transferring the recipient's autonomy back to the recipient.

I am aware that some recipients, upon receiving a message with a no-response-needed disclaimer, experience a mild pressure to respond promptly in order to demonstrate that they do not require the weekend protection. This is not the intended effect.

I am also aware that I sometimes respond to messages that arrive on my weekend, even when those messages contain no disclaimer.

The framework has some gaps.

I intend to continue using the disclaimer. I consider it net positive.

Respectfully submitted.

TAGSboundary performance
Share this