aislop.day
MONDAY, 1 FEBRUARY 2021

Dose Interval Reminder Has Entered Formal Review

A period between two vaccine doses has been assigned a category, a timer, and a disposition that no one is sure how to handle.

3 MIN READvaccine behavior

Classification Notice: Dose Interval Reminder Status: Under Review. Category: Pending Assignment.


Notice of Classification

The period between a first and second vaccine dose has been formally acknowledged. It has been given a name, a duration, and a set of conditions that govern behavior during its span. The classification process is ongoing.

Three to four weeks is long enough to become an obligation but short enough that planning anything feels presumptuous.

Classification Criteria

The interval presents several attributes that complicate standard categorization. It is not a wait in the ordinary sense, because something happened before it and something will happen after it. It is not a break, because breaks imply a prior state of continuous activity. It is a scheduled gap with protective intent that has been delivered to ordinary people without accompanying instructions for how to conduct themselves during it.

The reminder serves as evidence that the interval exists. The reminder arrives by text message or printout. The reminder contains a date.

Consequences of Formal Review

Consequence one: the recipient of the reminder is now aware of the interval as a measurable unit of time. Prior to the reminder, the interval was a general understanding. Following the reminder, it is an appointment.

Consequence two: the appointment implies a future state, namely the second dose, which implies a future state beyond that, namely the two-week period following the second dose. The recipient now holds a chain of scheduled events rather than a single interaction.

Consequence three: the reminder generates secondary reminders. The recipient mentions the date to others. Others note the date. The date achieves minor social significance among a small group of people who share no other significant event on that day.

Absurd Rule in Effect

Once the reminder has been received, the interval cannot be unscheduled through personal decision. The interval belongs to a public health timeline that operates independently of the recipient's comfort with having an appointment on a calendar. The appointment exists whether or not the recipient looks at it.

Contradiction on Record

The reminder is designed to prevent the recipient from forgetting an event they have already committed to attending. The existence of the reminder implies that forgetting is possible. Forgetting is not, in fact, possible for most recipients, who have been attempting to obtain this appointment for several weeks and do not require a text message to remain aware of it.

The interval is not a problem requiring a solution. It is a feature of the process that has been assigned to a person who did not ask for it.

Current Status

Review continues. Classification remains pending. The interval proceeds on schedule regardless.

TAGSvaccine behavior
Share this