aislop.day
THURSDAY, 18 MAY 2023

Progress Report on Prompt Screenshot Caution

Assisted work became ordinary before the etiquette for disclosing it had any agreed form.

3 MIN READai tool guilt

Reporting Period: May 2023 Status: In Progress Blocking Item: Disclosure norms not yet established

The subject has a prompt screenshot. It shows the input and the output, both useful, both relevant to the current project. The screenshot documents a process that worked. Sending it to a colleague would save time, clarify the approach, and demonstrate the method.

The subject does not send it.

The obstacle is not technical. The screenshot is clear. The colleague would understand it. The obstacle is the absence of a clear norm for what the screenshot represents, and whether representing it at all is the kind of thing one does in a professional context, and whether the colleague's interpretation of the word "assisted" would match the subject's interpretation, and whether that match matters, and whether the whole question will have resolved itself by next week.

The help is useful enough to use and awkward enough to disguise, which are two conditions that usually resolve each other. They have not resolved here.

Under the governing rule, prompt screenshot caution becomes procedure once the manual-check phase is complete. The subject runs a private verification: reads the output, checks the logic, confirms the result holds. This verification was performed before the output was used. The screenshot documents a step that has already passed review. None of this changes the sending decision.

One private manual check is added. The check is not for quality. Quality was established. The check is for exposure, a word that cannot be defined precisely enough to produce a clear pass/fail, so the check tends to run again.

Assisted work becomes routine while disclosure stays exceptional, pending further clarification of what disclosure would mean. The subject is not alone in this position. The colleague is almost certainly in a parallel process. Neither party has raised the topic directly, because direct acknowledgment would require a conversation that neither party has a script for.

The screenshot remains unsent. The output is in use. The approach was correct. The documentation of the approach is private.

Next Steps: Monitor disclosure norms for convergence. Expected timeline: unclear.

Recommendation: Proceed. The check has been run. The result is usable.

TAGSai tool guilt
Share this