aislop.day
FRIDAY, 5 FEBRUARY 2021

Classification of Charger Territory

The spatial arrangement of charging cables in a shared dwelling has been formalized without discussion, enforced without documentation, and contested without resolution.

3 MIN READhome office territory

Classification of Charger Territory Governing Framework for Shared Domestic Charging Infrastructure


Section 1: Definitions

Primary Charger shall mean a charging cable that belongs to one household member and has been assigned, through unspoken consensus or previous conflict, to a fixed location.

Nomadic Charger shall mean a charging cable that circulates through multiple locations and belongs to no one clearly, including but not limited to the person who purchased it.

Claimed Outlet shall mean an electrical outlet that is understood by at least one household member to have a designated user, whether or not this understanding has been communicated.

Section 2: Classification Criteria

2.1 A charger placed in a location more than twice is a charger that now lives there.

2.2 A charger removed from its location and not returned within twenty-four hours has forfeited territorial claim. Claim may be reasserted by return. Whether return restores original rights is a contested area of domestic jurisprudence and has not been resolved.

2.3 A charger that works with both phones in the household occupies a classification category that creates ongoing tension regardless of what is written here.

Section 3: The Shared Outlet

The shared outlet presents the primary classification problem. The shared outlet is proximate to the couch. Proximity to the couch makes it desirable. Desirability creates competition.

The shared outlet did not come with terms. Terms have been generated by repeated use and the strong feelings that use produced.

No governing document existed prior to this one. No governing document was requested.

Section 4: Known Violations

4.1 Using another person's charger without asking. Frequency: high.

4.2 Borrowing a charger and returning it to a location that is not where it was borrowed from. This creates a secondary search problem that the original owner bears alone.

4.3 Purchasing a new charger to resolve the scarcity problem without consulting the other household members about whether scarcity is the problem.

Section 5: The Governing Contradiction

The classification framework assumes that chargers belong to individuals. This assumption is not accurate. Chargers migrate. Chargers are repurposed. Chargers end up in bags and drawers and are not seen again until a drawer is cleaned.

The shared dwelling contains more chargers than anyone counted when the conflict began. Most of them are in the wrong format now.

Section 6: Status

Classification is ongoing. Territory remains contested. The framework described herein reflects the current state of affairs and does not resolve it. Implementation is left to the parties.

TAGShome office territory
Share this