aislop.day
TUESDAY, 8 MARCH 2022

Classification of Notification Boundary Post

A public commitment to using the phone less has been posted from the phone.

3 MIN READboundary performance

ANNUAL REVIEW: NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY POST Q1 through Q4 Assessment


Q1: Declaration

In January, the subject posted a statement of intent regarding notification habits. The statement was approximately forty words long. It described a plan to reduce response time expectations, to stop checking messages after 9 PM, and to maintain these habits without apology or explanation.

The post received seventeen likes. Three colleagues responded with supportive language. The subject replied to all three responses the same evening.

The post was composed and uploaded on the same device the post concerned.

Q2: Maintenance

By February, the boundary had produced a secondary obligation: explaining to people who sent messages after 9 PM that the boundary existed and was not a sign of displeasure. The explanation took longer than the messages it was replacing.

The boundary is meant to reduce obligation, yet maintaining the boundary becomes a new obligation. This pattern was noted internally. It did not change the behavior.

Q3: Adjustment

A second post was composed in April. The second post clarified that the boundary applied to work communications and not to close friends. This distinction had not been present in the original post. Its absence had created ambiguity. The ambiguity had generated questions. The questions had been answered individually.

The second post received eight likes.

A limit counts as successful only if the person enforcing it can prove they still care about everyone affected. The subject now manages two categories of after-hours messages with different response protocols.

Q4: Assessment

The original post was preserved. Both posts remain visible on the subject's profile. A third post has been drafted but not yet published, addressing a misunderstanding created by the second post.

Eventually notification boundary post acquires an unwritten enforcement system that everyone denies creating. People who follow the subject now time their messages based on their interpretation of the policy, which varies from person to person, because the policy has had three versions.

The phone remains in use after 9 PM for the purpose of monitoring whether any messages require an exception to the policy.

The exceptions have a separate, unstated policy.

Overall Assessment

The boundary exists. The boundary is maintained. The maintenance requires a phone.

TAGSboundary performance
Share this