aislop.day
FRIDAY, 5 JANUARY 2024

Hearing Concerning Fridge Door Thinking

Testimony and cross-examination on the practice of holding a refrigerator open as a cognitive aid during appetite deliberation.

3 MIN READfood rituals

HEARING TRANSCRIPT Matter: Fridge Door Thinking , Status Review Presiding: The Chair Present: One Witness Date: January 5, 2024


CHAIR: Please state for the record what you were doing.

WITNESS: I was deciding what to eat.

CHAIR: And the refrigerator door was open during this process.

WITNESS: Yes.

CHAIR: For how long?

WITNESS: I'm not sure. A while.

CHAIR: The door was open for forty seconds. We have a timestamp.

WITNESS: That seems possible.


CHAIR: Can you explain why the door was open while you were thinking, rather than closed?

WITNESS: I needed to see what was in there.

CHAIR: You had looked. You had a full visual inventory. You then continued to hold the door open.

WITNESS: I was still deciding.

CHAIR: You were deciding with the door open.

WITNESS: The cold helps. I think better with the cold.

CHAIR: You think better at refrigerator temperature.

WITNESS: I don't know if "better" is the right word. It helps me focus.


CHAIR: Under the governing rule, fridge door thinking remains valid once changing it would require more explanation than repeating it. Is this your understanding of the situation?

WITNESS: I wouldn't have put it that way.

CHAIR: But you would not close the door during the deliberation period.

WITNESS: It feels wrong to close it. Like I'm cutting off access to the information.

CHAIR: The information is food. The food does not change because the door is closed.

WITNESS: I know that.

CHAIR: But you keep the door open anyway.

WITNESS: Yes.


CHAIR: Fridge door thinking solves the immediate inconvenience once. That success makes repetition feel safer than reconsidering the behavior from scratch. Do you find that accurate?

WITNESS: The first time I did it, I made a decision. I closed the door. I ate the thing I decided on. So yes, it worked.

CHAIR: And now?

WITNESS: Now it's just what I do.

CHAIR: Even when you're not hungry.

WITNESS: I open the door sometimes just to look.

CHAIR: You open the refrigerator as an activity.

WITNESS: When I'm thinking about something else. The cold helps with that too.


CHAIR: Appetite explains the setting, but the behavior continues even when appetite no longer requires it.

WITNESS: That's a formal way to put it.

CHAIR: After enough repeats, the workaround survives even when the original inconvenience is gone.

WITNESS: The electricity bill is probably not ideal.

CHAIR: No. It is not.

The record will reflect that no changes to current practice were agreed upon at this hearing.

Hearing adjourned.

TAGSfood rituals
Share this